In reply to the first paragraph, I view accepting salvation as a work, and this equates arminianism to salvation by works. “why are you saved?” “Because I accepted salvation.” “why am I not saved?” “Because you didn’t accept salvation.”
You see how this is just like…
Maybe not how I’d write it but yeah thats near enough
And you see absolutely no logical fallacy in there?
Yes. I know. We don’t disagree on the role of Christ’s death. Seriously, go back and actually read what I’ve written so...
The point is, Jesus’ substitution is the effector and perfecter of our redemption, not our acceptance of it.
Comments