n1ghtcrwler replied to your post:You guys are driving me cray cray. It would mean that the Bible’s claim about its own inerrancy is false. Yet, just because one claim of a text would be false doesn’t mean they all would be. It just means scripture would be less trustworthy. That wouldn’t necessarily make God a liar, God could still exist. Though, the trustworthiness of scripture as his revelation to mankind would be called into question.Or the inaccurate thing being cited isn’t actually scripture. That seems to be a glaring possibility that is getting overlooked here. Not saying that’s the case, but we can’t ignore the option if we’re gonna consider this seriously.But that scripture is in the Bible, and therefore the biblical God must conform to it to be called biblical ;).
If we can just throw out bits of scripture because it isn’t necessarily Scripture, what is the point?
The point is that you’re making a black and white argument while ignoring real talking points on the matter. The argument that could be made (which, again, I’m not actually making) is that the Bible was correctly written but erroneously assembled. You just keep stating the same argument over and over again without presenting any reason to believe you’ve actually examined your basic presuppositions.
The point is that you’re making a black and white argument while ignoring real talking points on the matter. The...
Comments